Too late to turn back now. The new Link Road is
carving its way across the Combe
Haven Valley.
What are we getting for our £113 million? Is it worth the damage to the countryside?
I’ve been searching for the truth.
Countless enquiries, reports, meetings,
a Public Enquiry in 2009, a Department of Transport (DfT) study, a request for
a judicial review, and a grass-roots protest on the site in 2012 have failed to
produce any clarity or consensus.
What are we talking about?
A single
lane road taking a 3 mile looping route across open country from a new junction
with the A259 in Bexhill to join up with the Queensway north of St Leonard’s.
The East Sussex County Council (ESCC) website
tells us: ‘The road represents excellent value for money. It will bring much
needed regeneration to our economically deprived area, including 2000 new homes
and a 50,000 square metre business park in North East Bexhill, 3000 jobs, and economic benefits valued at £1bn. It will improve traffic congestion, particularly on
the A259 at Glyne Gap’.
Opposition campaigners deplore
the damage to the Combe
Haven Valley
and its wildlife. They challenge
projected economic benefits, say that the road
will increase traffic congestion, not reduce it, and that overall, the project is
poor value for money.
Historically, congestion
reduction was top of the agenda, with plans for an ambitious dual-carriageway bypass
from Pevensey to Icklesham finally rejected in 2001, largely on environmental
grounds. The Link Road,
a partial bypass, is that scheme’s legacy.
Well-respected planning
consultant Professor Alan Wenban Smith wrote in 2011: ‘while the main objective
of the BHLR is stated to be regeneration of the Hastings Bexhill area, the
‘side-effect’ of relief of congestion on the A259 has in fact dominated the
consideration of options’.
Worse, arguments about minute
reductions in journey times have taken attention away from reasoned consideration
of the economic benefits.
The only formal public consultation
about the scheme was back in 2004.
‘80% of respondents in favour of the road’ still appears in
ESCC publicity. But only 2558 out of 65,000 survey questionnaires were ever completed,
and the questions were mostly about traffic management.
People still think the main issue
is traffic. If asked about the Link
Road, Hastings
residents are sure to mention its impact on congestion on the A259 and the
seafront.
The truth about
traffic
According to Wenban-Smith and the DfT, traffic reduction on
the A259 will be minimal. Most journeys along that road are local, and the Link Road presents
too long a detour.
Original plans for another new piece of road, the Baldslow link, to
funnel traffic off the Queensway onto the A21, were dropped for cost reasons. Now,
Link Road
traffic will either rejoin the
A259 or access the A21 via already congested minor roads. In 2011, the DfT
estimated that traffic congestion on one such road, the Ridge, could increase
by 24%, and this was without the current spate of new housing developments in
that area.
Opponents of the road say that alternatives
to the Link Road
were not properly considered, and public transport was not prioritised.
However, as the report of the
2009 Public Enquiry makes clear, there are no realistic road alternatives, and
ultimately, successful regeneration of this area requires a massive upgrade of
the A21.
Improvements in public transport
would make a contribution to local congestion reduction, but no resources have
been set aside to improve it.
So, the Link Road will provide access to the new
North East Bexhill development areas and a limited improvement in journey times
between Hastings
and Bexhill, but lead to increased congestion elsewhere.
Unsurprisingly, ESCC have recently watered
down their traffic management aims,
and give a higher emphasis to regeneration.
The economic benefits
According to economists, building new homes adds no wealth to
an area – it depends who lives in them. Will new residents be skilled,
productive workers, or will they be people priced out of more expensive areas
of the country and forced to move here? Who can say?
Overall, the DfT
graded the Link Road
medium/low value for money.
This does not look
good….
Are ESCC guilty of reckless
optimism, as opponents claim? But is doing nothing really an option? Should
ESCC not do all it can to facilitate the much needed regeneration of this area,
even if attempts are limited in scope and uncertain of outcome?
All agree that the North Bexhill area is our only possible large-scale
development site. It needs opening up,
and it needs access from both Hastings and Bexhill.
The same applies to congestion
reduction. While, undoubtedly, more
resources should be allocated to public transport, it is probably better to do
something rather than nothing. At least the new road will provide another route
between Hastings and Bexhill, and hospital patients will have a quicker journey
between the Hastings Conquest and Eastbourne
hospitals – important as services are increasingly shared across the two sites.
But is it worth damaging the
beautiful Combe Haven Valley?
Who knows……Only time will tell.